Ant-Man

"Ant-Man" - though very good, talent to make a movie. It is with writers in Hollywood issue, and with directors and actors - not. We show the story, the story is jaded to the holes. His line is not changed from film to film, the only change is a superhero, duration, chosen life drama of simple set - fathers and sons, or the tragic love or something, and another ... and voila. I like it. Not that I instantly became a fan of Ant-Man, but he is a steady interest. I have reviewed the film.



In general, this is a movie trivia. Pardon the pun. Of course, the main change - a superhero in formic suit. Initially, of course, the idea seemed to me the choicest delirium. But the irony and good humor have made nonsense potential in a great movie.

About the other things - the film is very interesting to watch because of all sorts of discoveries. Microcosm of ants, which can be friends, that's very nice. All tricks with avengers - really witty. Tank Keychain - all aerobatics. This is such a great movie trivia grown. Again, really fun to watch.

Perhaps, another important and very successful component - the actors. The "Ant-Man" - a great cast. Steeper all, of course, Michael Douglas, in the sense of his character - a chemist Hank Pym. And then quite clear hierarchy - Paul Rudd plays a nice guy Scott Lang, he deserves the title of hero. But amid Pima it looks a little more modest. And the daughter of Hank Pym and Scott Hope's beloved - Evangeline Lilly created a brilliant girl with a strong character. And there are plenty of characters to which it is not necessary to tell them worth seeing. It is also a kind of discovery-stuff.
So, I think, "Ant-Man" and was a success, and wondered. I hope to continue.

No comments:

Post a Comment